Important

You cannot apply for this role

The application deadline has passed or the role has been closed for applications.

Role details

Chair of the Lay Observers' National Council

Application deadline 27 February 2023

Summary

Organisation
Lay Observers
Sponsor department
Ministry of Justice
Location
London
Sectors
Judicial, Prisons & Policing
Skills
Regulation
Number of vacancies
1
Time commitment
8 day(s) per month
Length of term
3 Years
Application deadline
11am on 27 February 2023

Share this page

The following links open in a new tab

Timeline for this appointment

  1. Opening date

    8 February 2023

  2. Application deadline

    11am on 27 February 2023

  3. Sifting date

    31 March 2023

  4. Interviews expected to end on

    30 April 2023

Timeline dates are only an estimate and can change

About the role

Role description

Operationally independent of Government, the Chair will be expected to lead the Lay Observers and challenge the Government to improve conditions, through regular engagement with senior government stakeholders as well as well-designed recommendations in an Annual Report. The Chair is responsible for leading the work of the Lay Observers and ensuring that there are systems, policies and guidance to assist Lay Observers to perform their statutory responsibilities effectively and independently. They are expected to lead the organisation in light of the protocol agreed with MoJ which sets out its remit and functions.

The National Council considers matters relevant to all Lay Observers and is led by the Chair. It is responsible for:

·       developing the strategy and culture of the organisation;

·       providing mechanisms for Lay Observers reporting on the conditions in which detainees are held and transported by escort contractors’ staff;

·       ensuring visits are carried out by Lay Observers, reports are completed, and concerns brought to the attention of the Prisoner Escort & Custody Service Contract Delivery Managers, HMCTS and other relevant stakeholders;

·       maintaining Lay Observers membership at a level which allows them to perform their duties; ensuring the recruitment of Lay Observers is conducted fairly, openly and on merit. The Chair convenes and oversees the work of the Lay Observers’ National Council. The Chair also ensures that, on a regional basis, monitoring is appropriately performed by the Lay Observers and that their work properly dovetails with that of other bodies, such as the Independent Monitoring Boards (IMBs) and prison inspectors.   

The Chair is the principal Lay Observer representing the organisation, as well as the national media spokesperson and national liaison point with Ministers, the Department, Parliament, His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS), His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and partner organisations. The Chair and National Council are supported by a Secretariat that is shared with the Independent Monitoring Boards; the Chair task manages the CEO of Secretariat.

In the Prisons Strategy White Paper, the Ministry of Justice has committed to bringing forward legislation to combine the IMBs’ Management Board and Lay Observers’ National Council into a single Board under a single Chair – both of which are to be recognised in legislation. The Chair will be responsible for leading this work with the Chair of the IMBs.

Therefore, whilst the length of tenure for this post is advertised as 3 years, this may be shorter if a legislative slot is obtained, and legislation is laid during this time.

Further information on the role of the Lay Observers can be found here.

Organisation description

This is an exciting opportunity to lead the Lay Observers, at a time when independent scrutiny, is high on Ministerial agendas.

The Lay Observers role is to inspect conditions in which detained persons are transported or held by escort and custody contractors in England and Wales and we require a voluntary, part-time Chair to provide strategic oversight to the organisation. Lay Observers operate independently of Government and are part of the UK’s National Preventive Mechanism, under the United Nations Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture, (OPCAT).

There are currently 48 Active Lay Observer members, excluding the Chair, who operate in England and Wales.  Lay Observers are unpaid public appointees appointed by the Secretary of State under the Criminal Justice Act 1991 (section 81(1)(b)). 

Regulation of appointment

This post is regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. For more information, please refer to the Commissioner’s website 

Person specification

Essential criteria

Candidates will be able to demonstrate the following:
  • Well-developed leadership, chairing and governance skills;
  • Ability to demonstrate a commitment to the fair and humane treatment of others;
  • A strong track record of driving forward cultural change and improvement in an environment where strong accountability is key;
  • Strong analytical skills, with the ability to ensure that the organisation produces evidence-based reports,
  • Experience of building strategic partnerships and successful collaborative working relationships; and
  •  Excellent written and oral communication skills with the ability to engage capably and constructively with a wide range of stakeholder groups including Ministers, senior officials in Government, senior leads in the inspectorate/scrutiny/national preventive mechanism arena, parliamentarians and the media.

Desirable criteria

Desirable criteria

• Evidence of valuing and promoting diversity;
• An understanding of the Criminal Justice System and the particular opportunities and challenges faced by volunteers; and
• Interest, knowledge and experience of issues faced by those in custody and those who manage prisoners/detainees on a day-to-day basis.

Application and selection process

How to apply

To make an application, please send:

  • A CV (maximum two sides of A4) detailing your qualifications, employment history and any appointments or offices you hold. Please also provide your preferred contact number and email address.
  • A personal statement (maximum two sides of A4) providing evidence against the role criteria and your suitability for the post, including evidence of leadership qualities and a vision for the organisation. Please consider the role and criteria carefully in preparing your statements. Information from AAPs indicates that applications which offer specific and tailored examples against the criteria, making clear the candidate’s role in achieving an outcome are often the strongest.  Structuring the statement around the criteria using relevant headings also aids clarity. 
  • Please Complete the Supporting Documents form attached.

Guidance on how to write a successful application can be found at Appendix 2 of the Candidate Information Pack.

Diversity monitoring - Please complete this online form HERE. Information is requested for monitoring purposes only and plays no part in the selection process.  It will be kept confidential and will not be seen by the AAP.

Please send your CV, personal statement and supporting documents to: PublicAppointmentsTeam@justice.gov.uk quoting reference PAT160055 in the subject line of your email.  We will acknowledge receipt.

If you have any questions about any aspects of this post, you are welcome to contact Paul Norris at Paul.Norris2@Justice.gov.uk

Overview of the application process

Public appointments are made on merit following a fair and open competition process which is conducted in accordance with the Governance Code for Public Appointments. We will deal with your application as quickly as possible and will keep you informed at key stages. We aim to conclude the appointment process within three months of the deadline for applications – this is in accordance with the Governance Code.

The assessment process

  1. Ministers are responsible and accountable to Parliament for the public appointments made within their department. As a result, they must be consulted at every stage of the appointments process.

  2. An Advisory Assessment Panel (“Panel”) is appointed by Ministers to assist them in their decision making. The role of the Panel is to decide, objectively, which candidates meet the eligibility criteria for the role.

  3. At the shortlisting meeting the Panel will assess applications against the eligibility criteria and decide which candidates have best met the criteria, who should be recommended for interview. Ministers will then be consulted on the Panel’s recommended shortlist. If you have applied under the Disability Confident Scheme and you meet all the essential criteria, then you will also be invited for an interview.

  4. Once the shortlist has been agreed by Ministers, you will be advised (by e-mail) whether you have been shortlisted. Those shortlisted will be invited to an interview.

  5. The Panel will meet again to interview candidates and determine who is appointable to the role. The Panel may invite you to make a brief presentation at the start of the interview and will go on to question you about your skills and experience, including asking specific questions to assess whether you meet the criteria set out for the post. The Panel will also explore with you any potential conflicts of interest or any other issues arising from your personal and professional history which may impact on an appointment decision.

  6. Details of the panel’s assessment of interviewed candidates are provided to Ministers, including whether they have judged a candidate to be appointable to the role. It is then for Ministers to determine merit and decide who should be appointed. In some circumstances, Ministers may choose not to appoint any candidates and re-run the competition.

  7. Ministers may choose to meet with candidates before deciding the outcome. Candidates should therefore be prepared for a short time gap between interview and a final appointment decision being made. Candidates who have been interviewed will be kept informed of progress.

  8. Once the decision on the appointment has been made, interviewed candidates will be advised of the outcome of their application, including whom they may approach for feedback. Successful candidates will be issued with their Terms & Conditions and a letter of appointment should they agree to take up the position.

Further information about appointments, including tips on applying, can be found on our guidance pages on gov.uk.

Advisory Assessment Panel (AAP)

Advisory Assessment Panels (AAP) are chosen by ministers to assist them in their decision-making. These include a departmental official and an independent member. For competitions recruiting non-executive members of a board (apart from the Chair), the panel will usually include a representative from the public body concerned.

The Panel will be:

  • Marie Southgate, Director of Prisons Policy, Ministry of Justice, (Panel Chair);
  • Alison Clarke, Deputy Director, Prisons, HM Prison & Probation Service (HMPPS), Expert member; and
  • Cindy Butts, Chair, Independent Commission for Equity in Cricket (ICEC), independent panel member (IPM). 
AAP’s perform a number of functions, including agreeing an assessment strategy with ministers, undertaking sifting, carrying out interviews in line with the advertised criteria and deciding objectively who meets the published selection criteria for the role before recommending to ministers which candidates they find appointable. It is then for the minister to decide who to appoint to the role.

Eligibility criteria

In general, you should have the right to work in the UK to be eligible to apply for a public appointment.

There are a small number of specialist roles that are not open to non-British citizens. Any nationality requirements will be specified in the vacancy details.

The Government expects all holders of public office to work to the highest personal and professional standards. 

Security clearance

The successful candidate will be required to undertake Baseline Personnel Security Standard checks in line with the Civil Service guidelines. Additional Security Clearance may also be required for certain roles. However, where this applies, candidates will be notified during the appointment process. Further information on National Security Vetting can be found on the Gov.uk website here.

Additional information for candidates

Equality and diversity

We encourage applications from talented individuals from all backgrounds and across the whole of the United Kingdom. Boards of public bodies are most effective when they reflect the diversity of views of the society they serve and this is an important part of the Government’s levelling up agenda.
We collect data about applicants’ characteristics and backgrounds, including information about people’s educational and professional backgrounds, so that we can make sure we are attracting a broad range of people to these roles and that our selection processes are fair for everyone. Without this information, it makes it difficult to see if our outreach is working, if the application process is having an unfair impact on certain groups and whether changes are making a positive difference.
When you submit your application, your responses are collected by the Cabinet Office and the government department(s) managing your application. The data is used to produce management information about the diversity of applicants. You can select “prefer not to say” to any question you do not wish to answer. The information you provide will not be seen by the Advisory Assessment Panel who review applications against the advertised criteria and conduct interviews.

Disability confident

We are a member of the Government’s Disability Confident scheme. We use the Disability Confident scheme symbol, along with other like-minded employers, to show our commitment to good practice in employing people with a disability. The scheme helps recruit and retain disabled people. 
As part of implementing the scheme, we guarantee an interview for anyone with a disability whose application meets the essential criteria for the role, set out in the advert, and who has asked that their application is considered under the scheme. Indicating that you wish your application to be considered under the scheme will in no way prejudice your application. By ‘minimum criteria,’ we mean that you must provide evidence which demonstrates that you meet the level of competence required under each of the essential criteria, as set out in the job-advert.
When you apply you will have the opportunity to select if you would like your application considered under this scheme.

Reasonable adjustments

We are committed to making reasonable adjustments to make sure applicants with disabilities, physical or mental health conditions, or other needs are not substantially disadvantaged when applying for public appointments. This can include changing the recruitment process to enable people who wish to apply to do so.
When you apply you will have the opportunity to request reasonable adjustments to the application process.

Principles of public life

Holders of public office are expected to adhere to and uphold the Seven Principles of Public Life. These are:
  1. Selflessness - Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
  2. Integrity - Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
  3. Objectivity - Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
  4. Accountability - Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
  5. Openness - Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
  6. Honesty - Holders of public office should be truthful.
  7. Leadership - Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour and treat others with respect. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.

Code of conduct for board members

The Government expects all holders of public office to work to the highest personal and professional standards. In support of this, all non-executive board members of UK public bodies must abide by the principles set out in the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies. The Code sets out the standards expected from those who serve on the boards of UK public bodies and will form part of your terms and conditions of appointment.

Management of outside interests and consideration of reputational issues

Holders of public office are expected to adhere and uphold the Seven Principles of Public Life and the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies. 
Details of declared political activity will be published when the appointment is announced, as required by the Governance Code (political activity is not a bar to appointment, but must be declared).

Status of appointment

.

Appointment and tenure of office

Appointments are for the term set out in this advert, with the possibility of re-appointment for a further term, at the discretion of Ministers.  Any re-appointment is subject to satisfactory annual appraisals of performance during the first term in the post. There is no automatic presumption of reappointment; each case should be considered on its own merits, taking into account a number of factors including, but not restricted to, the diversity of the current board and its balance of skills and experience. In most cases, the total time served in post will not exceed more than two terms or serve in any one post for more than ten years

Application feedback

We will notify you of the status of your application. We regret that we are only able to offer detailed feedback to candidates who have been unsuccessful at the interview stage.

How to complain to Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA)

If you are not content with the appointing department’s response you may wish to further complain to the Commissioner at publicappointments@csc.gov.uk.Further information on how the Commissioner handles complaints can be found on the Commissioner for Public Appointments’ website https://publicappointmentscommissioner.independent.gov.uk/regulating-appointments/investigating-complaints/

Data protection

The Cabinet Office will use your data in line with our privacy policy.

Contact details

publicappointmentsteam@justice.gov.uk

Attachments