- equality information (including the option of ‘prefer not to say’)
- information relating to any outside interests or reputational issues
- a Curriculum Vitae (CV)
- a supporting statement
- a short professional biography (150 words)
Treasure Valuation Committee, Trade Representative Member
Contents
Summary
- Organisation
- Treasure Valuation Committee
- Sponsor department
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport
- Sectors
- Culture, Media & Sport
- Skills
- Business, Commercial, Consumer Advocacy
- Number of vacancies
- 1
- Time commitment
- 2 day(s) per month
- Length of term
- 5 years
- Application deadline
- 5pm on 25 August 2026
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab
Timeline for this appointment
-
Opening date
21 July 2026
-
Application deadline
5pm on 25 August 2026
-
Sifting date
16 September 2026
-
Interviews expected to end on
12 October 2026
About the appointment
Introduction
Appointment description
The role of the Treasure Valuation Committee is set out in the Treasure Act 1996 Code of Practice as follows:
- to recommend to the Secretary of State valuations for the items brought before it which correspond as closely as possible, taking account of all relevant factors, to what may be paid for the object(s) in a sale on the open market between a willing seller and a willing buyer;
- to provide advice to the Secretary of State in cases where there may be grounds for either no reward to be paid to the finder, or for a reduced reward to be paid, or where there is a dispute as to the apportionment of the reward between the finder and the occupier/owner of the land or between the occupier and a person having a superior interest.
- to provide advice to the Secretary of State as to whether the finder of a Treasure case was an archaeologist (or a person engaged on an archaeological excavation or investigation) or not.
- to issue guidance from time to time on the valuation of finds, which valuers and interested parties should take account of.
Time Commitment: 7-8 Committee meetings a year plus additional time to study papers, exchange opinions with other members by email and telephone etc. The average time commitment is likely to be 2 days per month.
Location: Meetings are held at the British Museum, though some may be conducted via video conferencing software as appropriate.
Organisation description
Board composition
The Committee is made up of individuals who have been appointed either because of their knowledge and experience in antiquities and/or because they represent a group particularly involved with Treasure finds.
Further information available here.
Person specification
Essential criteria
- Experience with the commercial trade in British antiquities and/or in the collecting of such items
- Membership of a relevant trade association or relevant academic qualifications or experience
- Experience with the commercial trade in British antiquities and/or in the collecting of such items
- Membership of a relevant trade association or relevant academic qualifications or experience
- Knowledge of the types of antiquities commonly classed as ‘Treasure’ and acquired by museums
- A general understanding of Treasure issues and appreciation of the need to be seen to act within the spirit as well as the letter of the law
- An ability to assess objectively the value of Treasure finds
- Strong communication and interpersonal skills with the ability to listen, accept challenges and constructively challenge others with clarity and respect
Desirable criteria
Application and selection process
Public appointments are made on merit following a fair and open competition process which is conducted in accordance with the Governance Code for Public Appointments. We will deal with your application as quickly as possible and will keep you informed at key stages. We aim to conclude the appointment process within three months of the deadline for applications – this is in accordance with the Governance Code.
The assessment process
Ministers are responsible and accountable to Parliament for the public appointments made within their department. As a result, they must be consulted at every stage of the appointments process.
An Advisory Assessment Panel (“Panel”) is appointed by Ministers to assist them in their decision making. The role of the Panel is to decide, objectively, which candidates meet the eligibility criteria for the role.
At the shortlisting meeting the Panel will assess applications against the eligibility criteria and decide which candidates have best met the criteria, who should be recommended for interview. Ministers will then be consulted on the Panel’s recommended shortlist. If you have applied under the Disability Confident Scheme and you meet all the essential criteria, then you will also be invited for an interview.
Once the shortlist has been agreed by Ministers, you will be advised (by e-mail) whether you have been shortlisted. Those shortlisted will be invited to an interview.
The Panel will meet again to interview candidates and determine who is appointable to the role. The Panel may invite you to make a brief presentation at the start of the interview and will go on to question you about your skills and experience, including asking specific questions to assess whether you meet the criteria set out for the post. The Panel will also explore with you any potential conflicts of interest or any other issues arising from your personal and professional history which may impact on an appointment decision.
Details of the panel’s assessment of interviewed candidates are provided to Ministers, including whether they have judged a candidate to be appointable to the role. It is then for Ministers to determine merit and decide who should be appointed. In some circumstances, Ministers may choose not to appoint any candidates and re-run the competition.
Ministers may choose to meet with candidates before deciding the outcome. Candidates should therefore be prepared for a short time gap between interview and a final appointment decision being made. Candidates who have been interviewed will be kept informed of progress.
Once the decision on the appointment has been made, interviewed candidates will be advised of the outcome of their application, including whom they may approach for feedback. Successful candidates will be issued with their Terms & Conditions and a letter of appointment should they agree to take up the position.
Ruth Harper – Departmental Official
Ruth Harper has no political activity to declare.
Roger Bland – Public Body Representative
Roger Bland has no political activity to declare.
Gordon Barr – Independent Panel Member
Gordon Barr has no political activity to declare.
In general, you should have the right to work in the UK to be eligible to apply for a public appointment.
There are a small number of specialist roles that are not open to non-British citizens. Any nationality requirements will be specified in the vacancy details.
The Government expects all holders of public office to work to the highest personal and professional standards.
You cannot be considered for a public appointment if:
you are disqualified from acting as a company director (under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986);
have an unspent conviction on your criminal record;
your estate has been sequestrated in Scotland or you enter into a debt arrangement programme under Part 1 of the Debt Arrangement and Attachment (Scotland) Act 2002 (asp 17) as the debtor or have, under Scots law, granted a trust deed for creditors.
When you apply, you should declare if:
you are, or have been, bankrupt or you have made an arrangement with a creditor at any point, including the dates of this.
you are subject to a current police investigation.
You must inform the sponsor department if, during the application process, your circumstances change in respect of any of the above points.
When you apply you should also declare any relevant interests, highlighting any that you think may call into question your ability to properly discharge the responsibilities of the role you are applying for. You should also declare any other matters which may mean you may not be able to meet the requirements of the Code of Conduct of Board Members (see Outside interests and reputational issues section below)Additional information for candidates
- ensuring that application forms are available in different or accessible formats (for example, large print);
- making adaptations to interview locations including hybrid arrangements;
- allowing applicants to present their skills and experience in a different way, for example receiving interview themes in advance, having additional processing time during assessments, or choosing a communication style that best showcases their skills. Examples of different styles may include a video or audio application or a presentation in place of a supporting statement;
- giving additional detailed information on the selection and interview process in advance to allow applicants time to prepare themselves;
- arranging support such as British Sign Language (BSL) interpreters or allowing support workers;
- making provision for support animals to attend where possible;
- any outside interests that you may have, such as shares you may hold in a company providing services to government;
- any possible reputational issues arising from your past actions or public statements that you have made;
- and/or - any political roles you hold or political campaigns you have supported;