Please go to King's Counsel Recruitment | King's Counsel Appointments (kcappointments.org) where you will find further information and details of how to apply.
LAY MEMBERS FOR THE KING’S COUNSEL SELECTION PANEL
Contents
Summary
- Organisation
- Kings Counsel Appointments
- Sponsor department
- Ministry of Justice
- Location
- London
- Sectors
- Judicial, Prisons & Policing
- Skills
- Communication, Human Resources
- Number of vacancies
- 2
- Time commitment
- Adhoc
- Remuneration
- £840 per day
- Length of term
- Appointments will initially be for a two-year period, which may be extended to a maximum of five years
- Application deadline
- 11:59pm on 15 May 2025
Share this page
The following links open in a new tab
Timeline for this appointment
-
Opening date
17 April 2025
-
Application deadline
11:59pm on 15 May 2025
-
Sifting date
30 June 2025
-
Interviews expected to end on
31 July 2025
About the appointment
Appointment description
The Law Society and the Bar Council are seeking to recruit two lay members (one for an immediate start and one to start in January 2025) for the Selection Panel which recommends advocates for appointment as King’s Counsel (KC). The KC rank identifies excellence in advocacy in the higher courts. It is the most significant award available to an advocate, whether solicitor or barrister.
The Selection Panel comprises eleven members - two senior barristers, two senior solicitors, two retired senior judges, and five lay members. Legal and lay members play an equal part in all the work of the Panel, but the Chair is always drawn from amongst the lay members. It is essential that all the members should be of very high calibre: the Panel has significant responsibilities for making decisions with a real impact on the practice of law at the highest level.
Subjectin 2025, six are women and four are men; four of the members are from a minority ethnic background.
Panel members must be available for a minimum of 32 days a year, mostly between mid-June and early November. Appointments will initially be for a two-year period, which may be extended to a maximum of five years. Meetings will be held in London.
As a lay member you must be able to demonstrate an ability to sift through complex evidence from multiple sources and reach incisive judgements. To command public confidence and respect, you must display a proven commitment to equality of opportunity and diversity. You will have well-developed interviewing skills, although training will be provided and have held a senior position of authority. You must not be a member of the legal profession, but Lay magistrates are eligible to apply.
Organisation description
Board composition
The KC Selection Panel comprises a lay (non-legally qualified) chair, four other lay members and five or six legally qualified members (of which there will be one or two retired senior judicial member(s), two senior barrister members and two senior solicitor members).
The following comprise the Selection Panel for the 2025 competition:
• Monisha Shah (Chair) (lay member)
• Nicolina Andall (legal member)
• Matthew Chapman KC (legal member)
• Paul Grant (lay member)
• Diana Luchford (lay member)
• Sir Martin Moore-Bick (legal member)
• John Montague (legal member)
• Sara Nathan (lay member)
• Dame Anne Rafferty DBE (legal member)
• Sultana Tafadar KC (legal member)
Person specification
Essential criteria
The King’s Counsel Selection Panel exists to make recommendations to the Lord Chancellor on the appointment of King’s Counsel or ‘Silks’. It is essential that the Selection Panel as a whole should command the confidence of the judiciary, the legal profession and the public at large, having the necessary qualities to make appropriate recommendations for appointment in accordance with the agreed competency framework for KCs.
To be appointed as a lay member of the Selection Panel you are likely to have:
- Held a senior position of authority and responsibility in the public, private or third (ie community, not-for-profit and voluntary) sectors, or been a similarly senior member of an analogous organisation;
- Served in the wider public interest and be able to command public confidence;
- Experience of interviews and selection processes
Selection Panel members must be able to demonstrate the ability to:
- Judge evidence against a competency framework and a standard of excellence;
- Sift through evidence amassed from a number of sources and to reach an incisive judgment based entirely on that evidence;
- Able to work online, manage their own workload and meet targets and deadlines;
- Record the reasons for decisions and to be able to justify them;
- Work collaboratively and form professional working relationships with colleagues on the Panel, the secretariat and others;
- Have respectful dialogue with a diverse panel, contribute to collective decisions and abide by and support those decisions;
- Observe, at all times, the highest standards of confidentiality of applicants, assessors and, more generally, the internal workings of the Panel;
- Interview applicants in line with a competency framework. Some experience of interviewing is essential, although further training will be provided.
Desirable criteria
Application and selection process
Additional information for candidates
- Selflessness - Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
- Integrity - Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
- Objectivity - Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
- Accountability - Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
- Openness - Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
- Honesty - Holders of public office should be truthful.
- Leadership - Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour and treat others with respect. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.